All ETDs from UAB

Advisory Committee Chair

Jason G Linville

Advisory Committee Members

Elizabeth A Gerdner

Ray H Liu

Document Type

Thesis

Date of Award

2008

Degree Name by School

Master of Science (MS) College of Arts and Sciences

Abstract

In the testing of urine samples for illicit drugs by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), a drop in internal standard response is an indicator of possible sample adulteration. In 2007, Dennis V. Canfield (Liu et al. 2007) developed a formula to calculate factor A, an empirically determined value for the lowest acceptable internal standard (IS) signal-to-noise (S/N) response. Using this method, Liu et al. were able to distinguish true negatives from samples showing interference by ibuprofen and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the detection of 11-nor-9-carboxy-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) in urine samples. To determine if Liu’s method can be universally applied, a set of samples containing THC-COOH, deuterated IS (THC-COOH-d3), and ibuprofen were prepared at concentrations similar to Liu et al., but tested under a different set of laboratory conditions, and therefore a new value for factor A. Two types of ratios were used to evaluate the IS response of the samples. The first approach was to divide the IS signal by the noise. Two sets of data were produced, from ratios calculated using corrected and uncorrected values, respectively. The second approach was to divide the uncorrected IS intensity by the uncorrected THC-COOH intensity. While the uncorrected IS S/N ratio and the uncorrected IS intensity to THCCOOH intensity methods provided some indication of ibuprofen interference, the corrected IS S/N ratio method proved the most effective at identifying negative, positive, and inconclusive samples. Further research is needed to more closely examine the transition from no, to partial, and to full interference by ibuprofen in such samples. It is recommended that samples which produce an IS S/N ratio very close to the cutoff value of factor A also be considered for follow-up testing, as they may be exhibiting partial interference. The factor A method could also be useful in identifying other types of chemical interference encountered in drug testing, in addition to that of ibuprofen or H2O2 on THC-COOH.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.