Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Abstract
Editors of scholarly journals increasingly use web-based peer review and tracking systems to offer enhanced speed, communication, automation and a complete record of submissions and peer review history. Such digital tools are likely to increase frequency of revisions and ultimately lead to a higher quality published article. However, with the larger and ever more dispersed reviewer pool that is facilitated by web-based systems, there is less reliance on elite reviewers. Therefore, there is more pressure on editors to assign manuscripts for review appropriately due to more peer reviewers, academic globalization, and the inherent depersonalization of the digital editorial assistant.
First Page
67
Last Page
70
DOI
http://doi.org/10.1353/scp.2010.0000
Publication Date
2010
Department
World Languages & Literatures
College or School
College of Arts and Sciences
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Supplemental Associated Link
https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/50/article/395741#sub03
Recommended Citation
Long, Sheri Spaine. (2010). "Will Peer Review Still Function and How?" Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(1), 67–70. https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/fw-arts-sciences/2/
Included in
Other Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons
Comments
Article draft version, available via Project Muse